TeenSTAR Program Challenges Sex Ed Approach
by Amanda
Pawloski
NEW YORK, February 17 (C-FAM) The latest round of budget battles in Washington,
D.C. concerning foreign aid underscore a decades-long battle
involving what values should be imparted to youth regarding sex. An
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) declaration on
sexual rights issued last year is highly touted at international
events and demonstrates how many liberal organizations view young
people’s sexuality. The declaration amounts something like a
manifesto of pleasure, and particularly asserts youth are bearers of
“sexual rights.” The focus on youth at the UN has been to
liberate them from their parents in the name of sexual rights.
Yet, Dr. Hanna
Klaus’ Teen STAR (Sexuality Teaching in the context of Adult
Responsibility) program is challenging that assumption. Klaus is an
OB/GYN doctor and religious sister with the Medical Mission Sisters.
Her abstinence education course has become an international
phenomenon, receiving positive feedback from its participants. One
Ethiopian mother stated, “my daughter taught me about
menstruation.”
Teen STAR does
not fit into either the abstinence-only or comprehensive sex
education category, since they offer information on how to control
fertility through one’s natural cycle, otherwise known as natural
family planning. “We do not control people by withholding
information, we teach anybody and it is up to them to use their free
will,” says Klaus.
In December
2006 Klaus began receiving funds for her program from the US Agency
for International Development for HIV prevention. “Abstinence
prevents everything, you essentially kill two birds with one stone,”
said Klaus. “People will still exert their will no matter what you
do.”
However,
critics also abound, and a complaint was filed against Teen STAR in
October 2007 by the Center for Reproductive Rights. Homosexual
activists, posing as Scandinavian interns, initiated the original
complaint. The Center for Reproductive Rights describes Teen STAR as
“a discriminatory, gender-biased and medically inaccurate
extra-curricula sex education program.” The case has since been
resolved in favor of Teen STAR.
The attack on
Teen STAR’s funding was part of a larger campaign from the Center
for Reproductive Rights to de-fund all abstinence education programs
supported by USAID and PEPFAR because they do not promote condoms or
inform about abortion. When the Obama administration cut funding to
all abstinence-only programs, Teen STAR also lost grant money.
The program is
designed to inform teens about natural fertility cycles while
encouraging them to wait for marriage. Teen STAR has been working to
improve tracking outcomes to provide accurate long-term data on its
success rates. Klaus notes that the short-term tracking has always
demonstrated a reduction in sexual activity.
Most people
put contraception and abstinence on the same line, but there is a
huge difference in controlling behavior through respect versus
isolating fertility,” says Klaus. “Contraceptive programs have
very limited effectiveness in that regard.”
In conjunction
with their program Teen STAR hosts parent meetings where the
instructors explain what will be taught to the children. The program
is careful to be sensitive to what parents have already chosen for
themselves regarding family planning.